Northwestern Home Page   Oxide Surfaces


God made the bulk; the surface was invented by the devil
Wolfgang Pauli

The aim of our work is to explore the fundamentals of why certain types of oxide surfaces form, others do not, so we can start to design them for applications ranging from microelectronics through catalysis.

Oxides are ubiquitous as they are present on earth and in every soil and sediment as well as in aerosols, aquatic biota, and waste streams. They come from a variety of sources, both natural and anthropogenic.

For most bulk oxides the crystal structures are well established, and for many systems the thermodynamics are well documented from experiments and theoretical calculations. At the surface much less is understood. While one can easily perform theoretical calculations on simple bulk-like (e.g. 1x1) terminations, the actual thermodynamically stable surface and/or experimentally observed structures are often larger and more complicated. Until these surface structures have been unambiguously experimentally determined, the problem can be confused. Even for such a simple system as the (100) surface of the archetypal perovskite strontium titanate, there are at least six different experimentally determined surface reconstructions in addition to the simple 1x1 bulk terminations. Not all of these structures have yet been solved at the atomic level, and to date there is not convincing agreement between experimental observations and theoretical analyses as to which surface structures should be stable under what conditions. One example is the 2x1 reconstruction of the SrTiO3 (001)shown here, with the red atoms oxygen and grey atoms titanium. Strontium titanate is a important material both as a potential photocatalyst and for thin film growth. Before this surface structure was solved it was commonly believed that the (001) surface was a simple termination of the bulk. It turns out not to be at all like this, instead it has two layers of TiO2 at the surface.

A combination of electron diffraction and several computational methods has made such results possible. Our efforts at oxide surface structure determination remain successful and are still ongoing, which allows for further exploration of the properties of real surfaces. At present, the interaction between oxide surfaces and water (another ubiquitous species) is being studied both theoretically and experimentally.

Recent Publications

  1. A chemical approach to understanding oxide surfaces
    J. A. Enterkin, A. E. Becerra-Toledo, K. R. Poeppelmeier, and L. D. Marks
    Surface Science 606 (2012) 344
  2. Water adsorption on SrTiO3(001): I. Experimental and simulated STM
    A. E. Becerra-Toledo, M. R. Castell and L. D. Marks
    Surface Science (2012), doi:10.1016/j.susc.2012.01.008
  3. Water adsorption on SrTiO3(001): II. Water, water, everywhere
    A. E. Becerra-Toledo, J. A. Enterkin, D. M Kienzle and L. D. Marks
    Surface Science (2012), doi:10.1016/j.susc.2012.01.010
  4. Surface and Defect Structure of Oxide Nanowires on SrTiO3
    M. S. J. Marshall, A. E. Becerra-Toledo, L. D. Marks and M. R. Castell
    Physical Review Letters 107 (2011) 086102

  5. Vacant-Site Octahedral Tilings on SrTiO3 (001), the (sqrt(13)xsqrt(13))R33.7 Surface, and Related Structures
    D. M. Kienzle, A. E. Becerra-Toledo and L. D. Marks
    Physical Review Letters 106 (2011) 176102
  6. Wulff Construction for Alloy Nanoparticles
    E. Ringe, R. P. Van Duyne, and L.D. Marks
    Nano Letters 11 (2011) 3399
  7. A homologous series of structures on the surface of SrTiO3(110)
    J.A. Enterkin, A.K. Subramanian, B.C. Russell, M.R. Castell, K.R. Poeppelmeier and L.D. Marks
    Nature Materials 9 (2010) 245.